Email: Fauci Said Disease With Death Rate Similar To COVID ” Is A Severe Seasonal Flu”

Tucker: “So if it’s a really bad flu season, why did we shut down the country?”

Why indeed?

Arwen~ Many, including Fauci should be charged with crimes against humanity.

Round Two: 3,000 More Fauci Emails ReleasedIt’s now clear that in the earliest days of the coronavirus pandemic, public health officials in Washington were panicked. At the time, it wasn’t clear what the mortality rate from the virus would turn out to be. But that wasn’t their main concern. Officials in Washington were terrified of being exposed. They’d used American tax dollars to fund reckless experiments in China that in the end likely created Covid-19. If that fact were to become public, they’d be shamed and ridiculed and possibly even indicted. Their professional lives would be over. So they immediately set to work hiding it on a cover up. Last winter, a group of well-known scientists publicly dismissed the lab leak theory as absurd and categorically untrue, even as they wrote emails to each other admitting that the virus looked engineered by human hands in a lab. Meanwhile, Tony Fauci made sure fact-checkers censored anyone online who dared challenge the official story, which we now know was a lie. In the final days of the last administration, the State Department finally began a serious investigation into the origins of Covid and into what was happening Wuhan Institute of Virology. Almost immediately after the election, Joe Biden canceled it.In all, the lying went on for a year and a half. We’re just learning how deep it went.

Advertisement

Governments need to stop playing God

The suspension of social life has done enormous harm.

DAVID THUNDER 1st June 2021

ShareTopicsPOLITICS

Numerous Western governments, with the blessing of their scientific advisers, have suspended basic civil rights and effectively placed government ministers above their own constitutions – purportedly in order to protect public health. Instead of improving and expanding hospital facilities, fast-tracking the development of promising treatments and offering focused protection to the elderly and vulnerable, governments have confined citizens to their homes, shut down businesses, heavily restricted public gatherings and attempted to regulate the internal life of households.

If the exercise of such extraordinarily intrusive and illiberal powers had successfully quelled the pandemic, we might now view them as regrettable but expedient evils. But we now know, through international comparisons, that harsh lockdown policies did little to mitigate the overall incidence of disease and mortality compared with more moderate social-distancing restrictions. We also know, by looking at data on unemployment, business closures, mental health and delayed non-Covid treatments, that forcibly isolating healthy people from each other inflicts far-reaching and sometimes irreparable harms on citizens.

Several peer-reviewed studies have been unable to find any interesting correlation between the stringency or duration of lockdowns and lives saved. Regions with extremely aggressive society-wide Covid restrictions have suffered comparable levels of excess mortality to regions with much more targeted and moderate government interventions – just compare the UK and Sweden in Europe, or California and Florida in the US.

Much of this information has been available for a very long time already – certainly since early winter – yet many governments have continued stubbornly dragging out their lockdowns. The fact that governments persisted with such aggressive measures suggests our political rulers are either too arrogant or too cowardly to admit to their failures, cut their losses and make the required course corrections.

Perhaps the bigger problem is that many Western politicians simply do not know their place. In liberal democracies, governments are supposed to recognise there are limits to how they wield power. Yet our rulers seem to believe that if they ordain a suspension of social life by fiat, society will respond in lock step and viral spread will either be shut down or reduced to a trickle.

But social life is not a luxury that we can just suspend for a higher cause — it is the way we meet our most basic physical, spiritual and emotional needs. People will do what it takes to meet these needs, no matter what public officials decree. People will keep needing to be cared for, fed, nurtured, consoled and attended to by other human beings – and people will not tolerate social isolation forever, no matter how many police you put on the streets.

It is reasonable to feel some fear in the face of a virus that poses an elevated risk of death to the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. But we also have much to fear from governments that believe a public-health crisis gives them the right to play God with our lives.

David Thunder is a Ramón y Cajal researcher and lecturer in political philosophy at the University of Navarra’s Institute for Culture and Society. Follow him on Twitter: @davidjthunder

Governments need to stop playing God

Fauci now recommends face masks over your eyes

The same people that sell the panic….

MakeChinaPay For the #CoronavirusPandemic

by Gordon G. Chang
June 4, 2021 at 5:00 am

• Even if the coronavirus did not start out as a biological weapon, the world now has enough information to conclude that China’s regime turned it into one.
• Proponents of sovereign immunity make valid points, but there are overriding factors. Crimes against humanity are so heinous that no one should be barred from seeking compensation.
• Plaintiffs, at least as a technical matter, should be able to overcome the sovereign immunity defense: The Communist Party of China, which controls the Chinese central government, is not a sovereign.
• As of this moment, 3,579,000 people have died from COVID-19, including 596,000 Americans. The Chinese regime committed mass murder…. Mass murderers do not deserve sovereign immunity protection.
• It is absolutely essential that the Biden administration disabuse Chinese leaders of the notion that they can spread the next pathogen, or whatever else they are planning, without a cost.
• Let us remember what is at stake. In China’s laboratories, researchers are now cooking up far more deadly pathogens than SARS-CoV-2, including those that would leave the Chinese immune but sicken or kill everyone else.

It is absolutely essential that the Biden administration disabuse Chinese leaders of the notion that they can spread the next pathogen, or whatever else they are planning, without a cost. In China’s laboratories, researchers are now cooking up far more deadly pathogens than SARS-CoV-2, including those that would leave the Chinese immune but sicken or kill everyone else. Pictured: Workers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in China, on February 23, 2017. (Photo by Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images)

Click on link to read article in full –#MakeChinaPay For the #CoronavirusPandemic :: Gatestone Institute