WUHAN—Well, this can’t be good: an investigative journalist—a real one, not a “journalist” who complains about pronouns in videogames on Twitter—managed to infiltrate the Wuhan Institute of Virology. What they saw concerned them: for one thing, there appeared to be multiple vials of a mysterious substance, all of them labeled “Save for 2024 election.”
Someone had scrawled the words on the vials in red marker, warning lab workers not to open the vials until they’re needed in 2024.
“What’s that?” the journalist asked in an audio recording from her phone.
“That? Oh, that is nothing!” replied one scientist.
“Then why does it say that on the vial?” she asked.
“Because we want nothing bad to happen in 2024 so we are going to release the bottle with nothing in it that year. For good luck.”
She then narrowly escaped with her life as she saw the lab worker pressing the room’s “release the monkeys” button.
“This, uh, doesn’t seem good,” said one political commentator. “I guess I shouldn’t have thrown all those masks away.”
At publishing time, sources had confirmed the handwriting was in English and matched Dr. Fauci’s.
The average person dying from COVID-19 in Canada is an 86-year-old woman in a nursing home, says a new study.
“The COVID-19 mortality rate for the 85 and older age group outpaced the overall increase in the mortality rate,” said a StatsCan report.
“To understand both the direct and indirect consequences of the pandemic it is important to measure excess mortality.
“For those aged 85 and older, from 2011 to 2019 age-standardized mortality rates fluctuated, but generally declined from 239.8 deaths per 100,000 population in 2011 to 228.9 in 219,” said the report.
“Mortality rates for this age group increased by five% to 240.6 deaths per 100,000 population in 2020, marking the highest mortality rate for this age group in Canada since 2010.”
Most pandemic victims were aged 86, typically women in nursing homes, according to a Canadian Institute of Actuaries report.
The American Medical Association Journal last December 17 calculated people over 85 were 630 times likelier than the U.S. average to die of COVID-19.
StatsCan in an earlier submission to the Commons human resources committee said most deaths involved nursing home patients diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer’s, chronic heart disease or respiratory illness who “may have been at a higher risk of dying over this period regardless of the pandemic.”
“The majority of Canadians who died from COVID-19 were residents of long-term care homes,” said the StatsCan submission.
“Increased COVID-19 deaths may be attributable to the disease taking a heavy toll on people who have been at a high risk of dying” regardless of the pandemic, it said.
“An in-depth examination of this issue will be conducted using 2021 Census data. The 2021 Census will show how the pandemic has profoundly altered population growth, sources of income, commuting patterns and many other aspects of our lives.”
Arwen~ Justin Trudeau is guilty of this as well as some Premiers!
Are you concerned about public authorities who are publicly shaming those who have decided not to be vaccinated? Here is something every Canadian can do.
The Criminal Code of Canada makes it an offence to do the following:
Public incitement of hatred
319 (1) Everyone who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
When officials communicate publicly that those who choose not to vaccinate should be subject to hateful treatment, they could be charged under this offence. Not every communication against non-vaccinated Canadians rises to this level, but only if it incites hatred which is likely to lead to a breach of the peace.
Any individual in Canada can go to their local provincial courthouse to lay a Private Information or Prosecution. A Private Information may not be entertained if the individual who committed the offence does not live in the province where you attempt to lay it, or the offence itself did not occur there.
If the Information is accepted in that province, the usual process is to either phone or go to the court to ask to make an appointment with a Justice of the Peace to swear to an Information. If it is not accepted in that province by a JP, the RCMP will entertain the complaint on the same charge.
If you are attending the courthouse, bring the information needed to share the facts and how they believe someone has committed this offence.
On this issue, one should include on the form the particular incident in which you allege the offence occurred. If it is in a video, you can bring along the video clip as well as writing out the language the alleged offender used. You may also include how the statements made in your opinion resulted in hatred toward those who have not been vaccinated, the “identifiable group.” If you have evidence of this, share it. It may be helpful to outline how you believe the hatred is likely to lead to a “breach of the peace” or a disturbance or victimization. Also include how this makes you afraid and worried about ostracization. The same tolerance these officials like to promote is in stark contrast to the hatred they’re inciting.
A judge and Crown prosecutor decide whether or not to proceed with the charges. In this novel situation, it would not be unusual for them to decline. However, embarking on this process draws attention to a level of hatred shared by public officials that is unprecedented. That in itself has worth.
Laying a Private Information or Prosecution provides a mechanism for Canadians to hold officials accountable who are stirring up hatred for individuals who are simply exercising their freedoms to make health care choices. If we believe in freedom, we must believe in freedom for all. Anything else is dividing our nation.
The liberal left’s excuses mask the real culprit behind terror attacks
Arwen~ Excerpt from article
Beware those who would rather not, for, as Hitchens put it, “they are of the sort who, discovering a viper in the bed of their child, would place the first call to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals”.
Read article in full here-https://thecritic.co.uk/terror-and-its-apologists/